- A business would like the board to grant them two variances at 100 W Wisconsin Avenue (Christy’s Service at the corner of Wisconsin Avenue and Oneida Street). They propose to use this lot as they have for their repair/towing business but also for auto sales. Their auto sales plan would lead to them not following the setbacks and landscape buffering codes required by the city. Since the property does not seem to have any unique characteristics as required for a zoning variance, I suspect that this self-imposed issue (the owner wanting to sell autos on this lot without being able to follow the setbacks/buffering requirements) will not convince board members to grant these variance requests.
- Rascal’s Bar and Grill on Wisconsin Avenue would like a variance for a code requiring maximum lot coverage of 75%. Their proposal includes using pavers to cover some current grassy(ish) areas, leading to 91% of this lot being covered with impervious materials. Since proper lot drainage and runoff is of importance in the city, this variance is unlikely to be granted even though the lot is a bit smaller than the minimum lot size in this zoning district. Again, what the owner would like to do leads to a self-imposed issue… which is not a reason to grant a variance.
- An owner of a property on East Pauline Street is vehemently requesting a variance for a 7-foot-tall fence when a maximum 6-foot height is allowed by code. The owner states that her neighbor is such a nuisance to her that the higher fence is required. She’s stated that she’s taken out a restraining order on the neighbor since he “shoots gravel over the fence”… but that the 7-foot fence currently exists. So… even granting this variance would not solve her issue with the neighbor. While I suspect that board members will empathize with her plight with the neighbor, this property will not be granted a variance for the issue. Â
Â
Appleton Common Council – 7pm  After three proclamations by the mayor and a reappointment request for a member of the Fox Cities Room Tax Commission, there will be an opportunity for comment in a public hearing regarding the potential rezoning of the newly annexed property at the southeast corner of North Ballard Road and Werner Road. (Mentioned here.) While it’s great to see new development proposed on Appleton’s north side, there should be some near future discussions regarding the additional traffic near Appleton North High School (on Ballard Road and on CTH JJ) that will likely be a result of said development and the proposed Appleton Area School District (AASD) new elementary school east of the high school. There is no reason to oppose the rezoning item on this week’s agenda; but the traffic issue should be addressed separately. I will be asking city staff about this outside of this week’s council meeting.This week’s meeting will be another “go/no-go” vote opportunity regarding the restriping of downtown College Avenue (as has been addressed many times in earlier blog posts, most recently here). If you haven’t already, please let me know your thoughts on this project before we get to this week’s vote. The bid up for acceptance came in below the city’s budget for the restriping portion of this project so I have no real reason to oppose the acceptance of this contract. But I’m interested to know your thoughts on whether you think the project should proceed.
All other items on the agenda for the full council were hashed out last week in other committee meetings. I’d love for you to share with me any feedback on any of these items you might have. I love hearing from you and appreciate everyone’s opinions!
And with that… I’m off to enjoy the rest of this Mother’s Day (despite the cloudy skies). I wish you all the best… until we meet here for another blog post again next week…